Caucus Day Poll Release

We’ve got a Caucus Day surprise for you. 

Our final *FINAL* poll of the caucus. Here’s how things shook out:

Our last statewide poll had Biden out in front with Warren, Buttigieg, and Sanders each in close contention for the second tier. This time, we went into the field from January 28-30th and polled 300 likely caucusgoers statewide through landlines, cell phones, and text-to-web. 

In first we found Pete Buttigieg with 19%, followed by Sanders with 17%, Warren and Biden with 15%, Klobuchar with 11%, and all others well below the viability threshold. 

 

Our biggest takeaway with these final numbers is that anyone who says a particular candidate is best positioned to win is, to borrow from Vice President Biden, full of malarkey. The top four candidates are in a virtual dead heat, and Klobuchar isn’t that far off. That means precinct by precinct delegate counts and realignments are going to make this a nail-biter to the very end. For some more perspective on how this could swing, consider three things: 

First, we saw Buttigieg with the highest net favorability, 69%. But the rest of them? Each over 60% — Warren at 68%, Sanders at 64%, Klobuchar at 63%, Biden at 62%. These candidates are all broadly liked here in Iowa.     

Second: Realignment considerations. 70% of those we reached told us they’ll stick around and pick another candidate if their choice doesn’t reach viability. And of those who say they intend to realign, Warren gets 20%, Klobuchar 17%, Biden 17%, Sanders 13%, and Buttigieg 10%. 

Third, and perhaps most importantly, just 51% of those we surveyed indicated that they were 100% certain of their choice. For those in Iowa or who have visited the state, this is likely consistent with your experience. Even in this final stage, many are still making their final decision — not to mention their second or third choice. 

It’s been a wild ride, and we’re excited to see the results at the end of the night. Whether you’ve been following us since our first poll in September of 2018 or you’re jumping in now, thanks for tuning in. And to all of the staff, volunteers, media, caucusgoers, and especially the candidates: Good luck tonight. 

 

Full poll results here

 

 

 

January Poll Results

January Poll Results

Focus on Rural America Co-Founders former Iowa Lt. Gov Patty Judge and Jeff Link released the results of their latest poll on a conference call with reporters Monday morning.

This is the 6th quarterly poll from Focus on Rural America which began tracking presidential preferences and issues in September of 2018.   Our latest survey was fielded January 15 – 18, after the CNN – Des Moines Register Debate in Des Moines, Iowa. Here are the key findings: 

RURAL ISSUES

  • Iowans continue to prefer a candidate who makes it a priority to engage residents of rural Iowa over a candidate who makes it a priority to increase turnout in Iowa’s larger cities and towns 52% – 28%.
  • We asked Iowans whether a candidate should campaign in rural areas for the general election highlighting Trump’s policies which help oil companies and hurt ethanol production or whether they should ignore those places because they will support Trump no matter what.  Overwhelmingly, 86% of Iowa Democrats think the nominee should compete for rural votes while only 9% think it’s a lost cause.
  • Asked specifically whether Trump’s decision to grant waivers to oil companies which hurt ethanol production will hurt him a lot, a little or not at all, 65% said it would hurt him, including 35% that said it would hurt him “a lot.”  Only 27% said his decision would not matter.

We asked regardless of who you are voting for, “which candidate is best for the needs and interests of rural Iowa?”  Sen. Klobuchar has a clear lead with 29% with Sen. Warren, Sen. Sanders, fmr. VP Biden and Mayor Buttigieg essentially tied at 15, 14, 13 and 13 respectively.

HORSE RACE

Former VP Joe Biden led our first poll and leads the final poll with 25% which is identical to his support in our September 2019 survey.  Sen. Elizabeth Warren remains in second with 17% but slips 6 points from her September standing. Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Bernie Sanders maintain their 3rd and 4th place positions with 16% and 14% respectively up 4 and 5 points from the September poll.  Sen. Klobuchar remains in 5th but is moving closer to the viability threshold with 11% of the vote.

We asked Iowans which candidate is “best equipped to handle the current conflict and tensions between the US and Iran and other global hot spots”?  42% of Iowans chose fmr. VP Joe Biden.

SECOND CHOICE

While second choice is important, new rules this cycle do not allow voters to realign if they start in a preference group that is viable.  We first asked Iowans what they plan to do if their first choice isn’t viable. Would they stay uncommitted, pick someone else or go home?

  • 75% of Iowans said they will choose another candidate.
  • 17% said they would remain uncommitted.
  • 4% said they would go home.
  • 4% said they don’t know

It is significant the 17% say they will remain uncommitted and may indicate that uncommitted will be viable in several precincts.

For those who choose another candidate, of those not currently planning to caucus for a candidate at the viability threshold, Biden receives 24% support, Buttigieg 21%, Warren 16%, Klobuchar 7%, and Sanders 6%.

DEBATE IMPACT 

We asked Iowans if they had a chance to watch Tuesday’s final debate before the caucus.  51% said they watched all or some of it. 40% said they saw none of it. This is a lower number of debate-watchers compared to those who took our survey following the June debate.  But, 73% said they saw quite a bit or some of the news coverage of the debate.

We asked if there are candidates that you are now considering after watching the debate.  16% said Biden, 11% said Klobuchar, 10% said Warren, 9% said Buttigieg and 7% said Sanders.

We asked if there are candidates that you have definitely decided NOT to support based on their debate performance?  12% said Warren, 11% said Sanders, 4% said Steyer, 3% said Biden and Buttigieg and2% said Klobuchar.

METHODOLOGY

This survey was a combination of cell phones and land lines.  The sample size is 500 likely 2020 caucus goers with a margin of error +/- 4.4% conducted January 15-18, 2020.

The Economic Gap in Rural America

The Economic Gap in Rural America

A new report from the USDA reinforces what we’ve been seeing on the ground in Iowa and across rural America: Population levels and personal incomes are falling off, while poverty rates are on the rise. This bad news means it is more important than ever for presidential candidates to articulate their vision for helping rural communities get back on track.

In America’s completely rural counties, populations declined by up to 2% from 2010 to 2018. As populations declined, so too did growth in employment. These figures are more than what the numbers show — they illustrate what we’ve been hearing for a long time. You might feel the recovery on Wall Street, of if you live in the cities and the suburbs, but if you’re from a small town or a rural county things haven’t been getting much better for you. 

 

Things may have improved for some, but many still feel as though they are being left behind. You can see this most clearly through what the study reveals about personal income growth. In this time of supposed recovery and national wage growth, wages in farming and mining counties have actually fallen. That’s after President Trump ran a campaign on supporting both of those industries. 

It is absolutely vital we reverse these declining economic conditions in rural America. The 46 million Americans living in non-metro counties are just as important as those who live anywhere else. The good news is we have seen a lot of positive momentum from Democratic presidential candidates on this front. 

We’ve seen a number of plans aimed directly at halting this decline in rural areas. They go after school consolidation, hospital closures, crumbling infrastructure, Farm Bill reform, water and soil quality, value added agriculture and manufacturing, and more. It amounts to a complete recommitment to these important, hardworking people. 

Most importantly, they show Democrats are paying attention — that they care. That’s more than President Trump can say. What candidates need to do now is deliver these rural commitments to a national audience.

 

Squeezing the Margins

Squeezing the Margins

Something we’ve been saying since 2016 is that Democrats don’t need to win back every rural county. What they have to do is show up, articulate a vision, win where they can, and squeeze the margins everywhere else. Last night in Kentucky, Governor-elect Andy Beshear drove our point home.

There’s a few ways to define rurality, but any way you slice it Kentucky is near the top. Just over 40% of the population lives in rural areas. Any candidate has to consider their path to victory as they step into a campaign. For a Democrat in Kentucky, your first step is likely knowing you can win commandingly in Fayette and Jefferson County with strong margins, netting you near 250,000 votes. To win the state, you’ll need about 500,000 more. Where do you find the rest?

Here’s how Beshear did it: He drove up urban margins, won rural counties where he could, and squeezed the margins everywhere else. He showed up, worked hard, campaigned on things people cared about, and won with just over 5,000 votes. Of course, any analysis like this doesn’t do justice to the hard work and sacrifices made by the candidate, staff, and volunteers over the course of the campaign. But Beshear and his team knew that victory was going to demand that they hold the line in those rural counties. And they did. 

 

Democrats can’t view the next round of elections as one or the other — urban voters or rural voters, the rust belt or the coastal strongholds. It has to be all of the above. In the statewide and national races ahead of us in 2020, that’s how you piece together an electoral college win and take back the Senate.

September 2019 Poll Results

In the post-debate poll in Iowa, Focus on Rural America found some shakeups among the Democratic presidential contenders and some key takeaways for the field. Iowa Democrats are focused on electability and they see rural issues and a rural strategy as key to that end.

“The candidates are showing up in rural Iowa and voters are noticing. Most have come out with rural plans and that alone is more than we saw from Democrats in 2016. With Trump picking oil and gas over the rural economy, Democrats have a real opportunity. This poll shows without a doubt that Iowa Democrats want our candidates to talk about this because they recognize rural Iowa is a key component of any path to the White House,” said Jeff Link, Co-Founder of Focus on Rural America.

Voters don’t believe that President Trump allowing year-round E15 is enough to fix his Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) decision to give small refinery waivers to oil refineries, like Exxon and Chevron, and 76 percent believe the Trump Administration actions will hurt Iowa’s farmers and rural economy. An astounding 89 percent of voters believe that it is important Democratic candidates bring up the issue of the Trump oil giveaways and the disastrous effects for Iowa, with 57 percent saying that it is extremely or very important. Additionally, 83 percent of Iowa Democratic voters believe that Democrats should campaign in rural areas and make their case to rural residents.

“If Democrats keep showing up in rural communities and standing up for rural voters, we will win the 2020 election. We have an incredible field of candidates and most of them are focused on revitalizing the rural economy, undoing the damage of Trumps small refinery waivers, and restoring some order to politics-as-usual,said Patty Judge, Chair of Focus on Rural America and past Lt. Governor and Secretary of Agriculture for Iowa.

Other key findings:

  • If the caucuses were held today Biden would win, taking 25%, however Warren closely trails with 23%. Continuing to gain momentum, Buttigieg took 12%. Sanders and Klobuchar follow at 9% and 8%.
  • More than half of voters have ruled out Castro (60%) and Yang (64%), while 46% have decided against Sanders and O’Rourke.
  • Based solely on debate performance, 18% of caucus goers ruled out Castro, while 9% wouldn’t support Biden.

Support for a centrist candidate remains. 60% said they believe Democrats need to move to the center to beat Trump. 32% strongly believe beating Trump will take a moderate Democrat.

July 2019 Poll Results

ALBIA, IOWAFocus on Rural America’s latest poll went into the field following the very first Democratic debate of the year. The findings provide exciting shakeups for the horserace and steady support for rural America.

“I’m excited to see Iowans closely followed the first debate and will continue to work with the candidates to ensure they are engaging rural Americans in a meaningful way,” said Focus on Rural America Chair Lt. Governor Patty Judge. “Our poll shows that Iowans are paying attention and that they are prioritizing someone who can win rural America, because that’s what it will take to beat President Trump.”

The Focus on Rural America poll shows the current top candidates are in a virtual three-way tie. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris are on top with 20% and 18% respectively while Vice President Biden holds 17%. Next in line is Senator Bernie Sanders at 12%, Mayor Pete Buttigieg at 10% and Senator Amy Klobuchar at 4%.

The two nights of debate made for a crowded stage and had a huge impact on voters. 63% saw some or more of the debate while 83% followed the debate’s media coverage. 26% of voters said the debates had a big impact their opinions, in addition to the 37% who were persuaded by the debates at least somewhat.

The head-to-head polling above reflects the takeaway voters had on the debate winners. Most voters said, based on debate performance, they were won over by Harris (34%), Warren (16%), Buttigieg (11%), Biden (7%) Castro (6%) and Sanders (6%).

Having more than 20 candidates to choose from shook up the debates and left a few of them off the stage, but this year voter participation will see some changes as well. In Iowa the caucuses will expand by including a virtual option for voters to participate online. 20% of Iowan’s we polled reported they planned to caucus virtually but we weighted their choice to only 10% to accurately reflect the rules established for a virtual caucus.

The good news for rural America? Exciting debates and virtual caucuses don’t change everything. 83% of Iowans support expanding production of renewable biofuels and 64% think President Trump’s waivers for oil and gas companies hurt rural economies. In addition, our latest poll maintains the steady report from Iowans on how to beat President Trump. 62% said Democrats should stick to the center, as opposed to the left, and 51% believe they need to prioritize engaging rural voters.

Focus on Rural America is polling Iowans quarterly and will have our next poll in the field this September.